IVD Leadership Hiring: Assessing Quality Systems, Manufacturing Scale-Up and Market Access

IVD Leadership Hiring
Hiring senior leaders in in vitro diagnostics (IVD) requires a clear understanding of how quality systems, manufacturing performance, and market access influence one another. Diagnostic companies need executives who can protect product reliability while expanding production capacity, supporting regulatory compliance, and building commercially sustainable operations. Organizations working with in vitro diagnostics executive recruiters can focus their search on leaders whose experience matches the company’s product portfolio, operating model, development stage, and growth ambitions.

The challenge is that these responsibilities cannot be managed independently. Manufacturing expansion can expose weaknesses in quality processes. Supplier changes can affect product consistency and documentation. Market expansion can introduce new regulatory obligations, distribution requirements, and customer expectations. Executives must understand these connections and create an operating strategy that supports growth without compromising product performance or compliance.

Why IVD Leadership Requires an Integrated Operating Perspective

IVD organizations develop and manufacture products used to analyze human specimens and support clinical decisions. Depending on the portfolio, these products may include diagnostic reagents, test kits, instruments, molecular diagnostic systems, immunoassays, or integrated testing platforms.

Each product category has specific technical and operational demands. However, successful leadership across IVD businesses generally requires the ability to coordinate quality, regulatory affairs, manufacturing, supply chain, product development, commercial operations, and customer support.

For example, a company preparing to increase production may discover that its existing process controls are not sufficiently robust for the intended volume. A commercial team entering a new geography may identify demand that the current supply network cannot reliably support. A supplier substitution may improve availability but require technical assessment, documentation, and change-control activities before implementation.

These situations require executives who can evaluate business opportunities alongside operational and compliance risks. During recruitment, organizations should assess three broad capabilities:

  • Quality and regulatory judgment: The ability to establish effective quality systems, manage risk, and integrate compliance into daily operations.
  • Manufacturing and operational execution: The ability to scale production, improve process reliability, manage suppliers, and align capacity with demand.
  • Commercial and market access leadership: The ability to evaluate market requirements, coordinate market-entry plans, and build sustainable customer adoption.

The relative importance of these capabilities will depend on the company’s current constraints. An organization preparing for international expansion may prioritize regulatory and market access experience, while a business facing inconsistent production may need a stronger manufacturing and quality leader.

Assessing Quality Systems Leadership in IVD Organizations

Quality Systems Leadership

Quality systems are fundamental to reliable diagnostic products. They support controlled processes, documented responsibilities, appropriate records, risk management, supplier oversight, and consistent handling of nonconformities. Strong quality leadership helps ensure that these practices remain effective as the organization grows.

However, quality leadership should not be assessed solely through audit history or familiarity with standards. Senior executives must also demonstrate the ability to build a quality culture, resolve recurring problems, develop capable teams, and work constructively with manufacturing, engineering, research and development, and commercial stakeholders.

Look for evidence of effective quality-system management

Hiring teams should explore the candidate’s direct experience with quality management systems, internal and external audits, corrective and preventive actions, document control, training, risk management, supplier quality, and change control.

Relevant questions include:

  • How has the candidate improved a quality system that was not keeping pace with organizational growth?
  • What approach did they use to investigate recurring nonconformities or product-quality concerns?
  • How did they determine whether corrective actions addressed underlying causes?
  • How have they prepared teams for audits or regulatory inspections?
  • How did they balance production priorities with quality requirements when delivery pressure increased?

Strong candidates should be able to explain the problem, the evidence they reviewed, the decisions they made, and how they evaluated the effectiveness of the response. Their examples should demonstrate that quality management is an operating discipline rather than a documentation exercise.

Evaluate their ability to build a proactive quality culture

As organizations expand, informal practices and individual knowledge can become inadequate. Different teams may interpret procedures differently, training can fall behind process changes, and issues may be escalated inconsistently. A capable quality executive establishes clear ownership and practical processes that help prevent problems rather than merely responding after they occur.

Ask candidates how they encourage early reporting, support root-cause investigations, and ensure that lessons learned are applied across relevant teams. Explore how they work with operations leaders when a proposed improvement could affect validated processes, product specifications, or controlled documentation.

Also assess whether the candidate understands the company’s applicable regulatory obligations. Requirements differ by market and product, so an effective leader must be able to work with regulatory specialists and interpret quality-system expectations in the context of the business’s actual products and geographies.

Recruiting Executives Who Can Lead Manufacturing Scale-Up

Manufacturing scale-up is a major leadership challenge for IVD businesses moving from limited production to broader commercial supply. Higher volumes can expose weaknesses in equipment capability, process consistency, workforce training, supplier reliability, production planning, and quality controls.

Increasing output is therefore not simply a matter of adding shifts, equipment, or personnel. The organization must determine whether its processes can produce consistent results at the intended scale and whether its infrastructure, documentation, staffing, and supply network can support the growth plan.

Assess experience in production readiness and process control

Executive candidates should have experience matching production capabilities to product requirements and business demand. Depending on the role, this may include process development, technology transfer, equipment qualification, process validation where applicable, automation, production planning, yield improvement, and manufacturing performance management.

Ask candidates to describe a scale-up program they led or significantly influenced. Establish what they personally owned, which operational constraints they encountered, how they worked with quality and engineering teams, and how they determined whether the expanded process was ready for routine production.

Useful interview questions include:

  • How did the candidate identify bottlenecks before increasing production volume?
  • What steps were taken to maintain consistency as production expanded?
  • How were equipment limitations, process variation, or staffing gaps addressed?
  • How did the candidate coordinate manufacturing readiness with quality and regulatory teams?
  • What measures were used to monitor output, yield, deviations, waste, and delivery reliability?

The strongest candidates explain how they used operational evidence to prioritize improvements. They should also recognize that the right performance measures depend on the production environment, product type, and quality requirements.

Evaluate supplier and supply-chain leadership

Supply Chain Leadership

IVD manufacturers may depend on specialized raw materials, reagents, components, instruments, packaging, or external manufacturing services. Disruption in one part of the supply network can affect production schedules and customer commitments.

Senior leaders should understand supplier qualification, material availability, lead times, inventory planning, supplier performance, and the quality implications of sourcing changes. They should also be able to work across Procurement, Quality, Manufacturing, and Finance when evaluating alternatives.

During interviews, explore how candidates have responded to supplier shortages, inconsistent incoming materials, capacity constraints, or changes in demand. Ask how they evaluated contingency options and maintained appropriate quality oversight.

Be careful not to equate experience at a large, established manufacturer with automatic readiness for every environment. A leader who has managed a mature global supply chain may need to adapt to a smaller company with limited infrastructure. Conversely, a candidate who has built operations in a smaller organization may need additional experience managing complex, multi-site production.

Test the ability to connect manufacturing performance with business outcomes

Manufacturing executives must understand the relationship between quality, cost, capacity, delivery, and profitability. A cost-reduction initiative that creates excessive process variability may undermine product reliability. Expanding capacity without a realistic demand forecast may tie up capital. Reducing inventory without accounting for supplier lead times can increase the risk of supply interruptions.

Ask candidates to explain how they evaluate these trade-offs. Look for disciplined planning, clear escalation practices, and the ability to communicate operational risks in terms that executive leadership can use when making investment and growth decisions.

Evaluating Market Access and Commercial Readiness

Market access involves more than obtaining permission to sell a diagnostic product. Depending on the market and business model, it can include regulatory requirements, reimbursement considerations, procurement processes, distribution strategy, laboratory adoption, pricing, and customer support.

Executives need to understand which barriers matter most for their product and target customers. A diagnostic platform designed for large laboratories may require a different commercial approach from a point-of-care product intended for decentralized settings. A product entering a new country may face different regulatory, distribution, service, and purchasing requirements from those in its established markets.

Assess regulatory and geographic market-entry experience

Market-entry planning should account for applicable product requirements, evidence needs, labeling, local representation where relevant, distribution arrangements, and post-market responsibilities. These obligations vary across jurisdictions and product categories.

When assessing executive candidates, ask how they have coordinated regulatory affairs, quality, commercial teams, and local partners during expansion. Explore how they identified market-specific requirements, sequenced launch activities, and managed dependencies that could affect the commercial timeline.

Candidates should be able to distinguish between a market that appears attractive and one the company is realistically prepared to serve. Their assessment should consider regulatory readiness, operational capacity, customer demand, competitive positioning, and the resources required to support the product after launch.

Evaluate understanding of customer adoption and purchasing decisions

Diagnostic products must fit the needs of the people and organizations that purchase, operate, or rely on them. Laboratory customers may consider analytical performance, throughput, workflow compatibility, service support, total operating cost, and supply reliability. Procurement teams may focus on pricing, contracts, vendor reliability, and standardization.

Strong commercial executives understand these different priorities and can translate them into a credible value proposition. They also recognize that adoption may require demonstrations, training, applications support, service infrastructure, and ongoing customer engagement.

Ask candidates how they have assessed customer needs, built market-entry plans, managed channel partners, and incorporated customer feedback into product and commercial decisions. Their answers should show how they connect market insight with practical execution.

Understand reimbursement and purchasing complexity

Depending on the diagnostic product and market, reimbursement policies, payment models, laboratory economics, or institutional purchasing rules may influence adoption. Not every IVD product follows the same reimbursement pathway, and reimbursement may not be the principal barrier in every setting.

Hiring teams should therefore assess whether candidates understand the specific commercial environment in which the company operates. A strong market access leader can identify relevant stakeholders, evaluate the evidence needed to support adoption, and coordinate the appropriate internal and external expertise.

Which IVD Executive Profile Does the Organization Need?

The most appropriate hire depends on where leadership gaps are affecting performance. Organizations should define the central business problem before selecting a title or candidate profile.

Chief Quality Officer or Vice President of Quality

Chief Quality Officer

This role may be appropriate when the organization needs stronger quality governance, a more effective quality management system, improved audit readiness, or consistent practices across sites and product lines. Candidates should demonstrate both technical understanding and the ability to influence senior stakeholders.

Vice President of Manufacturing or Operations

When production capacity, process consistency, operational efficiency, or supply reliability is the principal challenge, manufacturing leadership may be the priority. The ideal candidate can connect production performance with quality requirements, investment planning, workforce development, and business demand.

Regulatory and Quality Executive

Some businesses need integrated leadership across regulatory affairs and quality systems, particularly when market expansion and operational changes are closely connected. Hiring teams should establish whether the candidate has meaningful depth across both areas or is stronger in one discipline and will need support from specialist leaders.

Commercial or Market Access Executive

Companies preparing to expand geographically, develop distribution channels, improve customer adoption, or strengthen commercial execution may need a senior market-facing leader. Candidates should understand the product’s technical and regulatory context as well as the customer and purchasing environment.

Chief Operating Officer or General Management Leader

When challenges span manufacturing, quality, supply chain, and commercial delivery, a broader operating executive may be required. This leader must be able to establish shared priorities, resolve conflicts between functions, and ensure that growth plans remain aligned with operational capability.

Before recruitment begins, define the role’s scope, reporting relationships, decision rights, available resources, and first-year objectives. This prevents the job specification from becoming an unrealistic combination of responsibilities that no single executive can reasonably own.

A Structured Process for Assessing IVD Leadership Candidates

IVD Leadership Candidates

1. Identify the most important business challenge

Determine whether the immediate priority is quality-system improvement, manufacturing scale-up, supply continuity, market entry, or commercial growth. Establish the outcomes the executive must deliver and the constraints that currently prevent progress.

2. Build a role-specific competency scorecard

Define the required capabilities across quality, operations, regulatory coordination, commercial strategy, financial judgment, and people leadership. Weight each competency according to the role rather than treating all requirements as equally important.

3. Use evidence-based interviews

Ask candidates to discuss specific decisions and situations. For example, present a scenario in which demand is increasing but production deviations are also rising. Ask how the candidate would investigate the issue, protect product quality, assess capacity, communicate with customers, and decide whether additional production should proceed.

Another useful scenario involves entering a new market while the regulatory and distribution plans remain incomplete. Strong candidates should identify the information required, establish dependencies, involve the right specialists, and avoid making commercial commitments before readiness is adequately assessed.

4. Verify personal accountability

Distinguish between candidates who participated in a project and those who owned key decisions. Ask about their direct responsibilities, team structure, available resources, obstacles encountered, and the evidence used to evaluate results. Professional references can help validate the scope of their leadership.

5. Align leadership authority with expectations

Executives need the authority and resources to deliver the outcomes for which they are accountable. Clarify budget responsibility, staffing, reporting lines, access to senior decision-makers, and relationships with quality, regulatory, manufacturing, and commercial teams before finalizing an appointment.

Common Mistakes in IVD Leadership Hiring

  • Hiring for audit experience alone: A candidate’s audit history does not necessarily demonstrate the ability to build a proactive quality culture or lead complex operational decisions.
  • Confusing production volume with scale-up capability: Executives must show how they maintained process control, quality, and supply reliability as operations expanded.
  • Treating market access as a sales responsibility: Successful market entry may require coordination across regulatory affairs, quality, operations, distribution, customer support, and commercial teams.
  • Overlooking organizational fit: A leader from a highly structured global company may need to adapt to a smaller, resource-constrained business, while a startup executive may need support in a more complex multi-site environment.
  • Creating an excessively broad job description: Combining every quality, manufacturing, regulatory, and commercial responsibility can obscure the true priorities and weaken candidate assessment.

A focused recruitment process reduces these risks by defining the mandate, identifying the essential competencies, and evaluating candidates against the actual challenges they will face.

Conclusion: Hire IVD Leaders Who Can Support Controlled Growth

IVD leadership hiring requires a practical understanding of the relationship between quality systems, manufacturing performance, and market access. Quality processes must remain effective as production expands. Manufacturing plans must reflect technical and supply-chain realities. Market-entry decisions must account for regulatory obligations, customer needs, and the company’s ability to support products reliably.

The right executive combines relevant functional expertise with cross-functional judgment, sound decision-making, and the ability to build capable teams. Organizations should define their immediate priorities, assess candidates through real examples, verify individual contributions, and ensure that the role has the authority required to deliver its objectives.

By aligning executive recruitment with clear operational and commercial goals, diagnostic companies can strengthen their leadership capacity, manage growth more effectively, and support reliable product performance across the markets they serve.

Frequently Asked Questions

What should companies look for when hiring an IVD quality executive?

Companies should assess experience with quality management systems, risk management, audits, corrective and preventive actions, supplier quality, change control, and team leadership. Candidates should also demonstrate the ability to integrate quality into daily operations and support business growth without compromising product requirements.

How can employers assess manufacturing scale-up experience?

Ask candidates to describe their direct involvement in increasing production capacity, improving process consistency, managing equipment and staffing constraints, coordinating technology transfer, and maintaining appropriate quality controls. Their examples should demonstrate how they made decisions and evaluated operational readiness.

Why is market access important in IVD executive hiring?

Market access can influence whether a diagnostic product can be introduced, purchased, adopted, and supported successfully in a target geography. Depending on the market, relevant factors may include regulatory requirements, reimbursement, procurement, distribution, customer workflows, and service capabilities.

Should quality and manufacturing report to the same executive?

The appropriate structure depends on the organization’s size, product portfolio, regulatory environment, and governance model. Some companies use integrated operating leadership, while others maintain separate quality and manufacturing reporting lines. In either model, responsibilities and escalation pathways should be clear, and quality decisions must receive appropriate independence and authority.

What is the difference between a manufacturing executive and a COO in an IVD company?

A manufacturing executive typically focuses on production, process performance, capacity, and manufacturing teams. A COO generally has a broader operating mandate that may include manufacturing, supply chain, quality coordination, service delivery, and other business functions. Actual responsibilities vary by organization.

How can companies reduce risk when recruiting IVD executives?

Define the business mandate before starting the search, create a role-specific competency scorecard, use structured interviews, validate candidates’ individual contributions, conduct relevant reference checks, and ensure that the incoming executive has clear authority and adequate resources.

Tanya Gallardo

Managing Director, Executive Search & AI Talent Strategy

Tanya Gallardo is the Managing Director of Executive Search & AI Talent Strategy at JRG Partners, leading C-suite and Board engagements across key growth sectors including Technology, Financial Services, and Manufacturing.

With over 18 years of experience specializing in disruptive technology leadership, Tanya is recognized as a leading authority on talent architecture for future-focused executive roles, such as the Chief AI Officer (CAIO) and Chief Digital Officer (CDO). Her expertise lies in accurately assessing the cultural fit and technical depth required to ensure a high return on investment (ROI) for critical leadership appointments.

Prior to her role at JRG Partners, Tanya held senior roles directing global talent acquisition strategies at a major publicly-traded technology firm, advising on organizational design and succession planning for emerging executive functions. She is a recognized speaker and contributor to industry events, sharing data-driven insights on executive compensation, leadership development, and the measurable business impact of C-suite talent.

Connect with Tanya to discuss your executive search needs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *